Skip to main content

.

This report updates the share of the Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index with high-profile covenant loopholes associated with particular borrowers—J. Crew, Serta, Chewy and Envision—as of Sept. 30 based on Covenant Review’s extensive database, which covers 98% of Index loans. In addition, we provide the latest read of what percentage of Index borrowers can issue new first-lien debt under free-and-clear incremental tranche without triggering an MFN either because (1) the MFN has expired or (2) the document carves out F&C tranche from yield protection.

Looking at performing loans to borrowers rated Triple-C and/or bid at less than 90 cents on the dollar—situations for which players will have the most incentive to employ loopholes to shift value either from lenders to equity or from some lenders to others by priming exercises—the share is in the same zip code, as we detail ahead.

Majority Consent Voting (“Serta Loophole”)

This, along with the phantom guarantee, is the most far-reaching loophole of the five among Index loans. Headline stats:

  • All Index Loans: 62.4% overall/63.4% PE-backed allow majority—rather than unanimous—voting.
  • Loan to borrowers rated CCC by either Moody’s or S&P: 67.3% overall/66.7% PE-backed.
  • Loans currently bid below 90: 61.4% overall/60.1% by PE-backed.

Phantom Guarantee (“PetSmart/Chewy Loophole”)

This provision allows for the automatic release of guarantees of entities that become “excluded subsidiaries” by virtue of being not wholly owned by the restricted group entities:

  • All Index Loans: 64.3% overall/67.7% PE-backed allow automatic release of guarantees of excluded subsidiaries.
  • Loan to borrowers rated CCC by either Moody’s or S&P: 67.3% overall/67.3% PE-backed.
  • Loans currently bid below 90: 67.1% overall/71.5% PE-backed.

Pass-Through Investment Basket (“J. Crew Trapdoor”)

This provision, which came to light early in the cycle, is the least penetrating across the Index:

  • All Index Loans: 7.0% overall/8.5% PE-backed allow borrowers to transfer intellectual property to unrestricted subsidiaries subject to certain caps and limits.
  • Loan to borrowers rated CCC by either Moody’s or S&P: 8.7% overall/9.5% PE-backed.
  • Loans currently bid below 90: 7.2% overall/5.7% PE-backed.

Envision Loophole

This provision we define as loans with: (1) no blocker on transferring material IP or other material assets to unrestricted subsidiaries, (2) a high cap on investments in unrestricted subsidiaries, and (3) simple majority consent voting:

  • All Index Loans: 21.3% overall/25.3% PE-backed allow borrowers to transfer intellectual property to unrestricted subsidiaries subject to certain caps and limits.
  • Loan to borrowers rated CCC by either Moody’s or S&P: 19.9% overall/21.4% PE-backed.
  • Loans currently bid below 90: 18.4% overall/20.9% PE-backed.

No MFN on Free-and-Clear Tranche Protection

The stats here include loans on which MFN sunset is now expired as well as loans that carved out the F&C tranche from MFN protection:

  • All Index Loans: 55.4% overall/56.1% PE-backed allow borrowers to transfer intellectual property to unrestricted subsidiaries subject to certain caps and limits.
  • Loan to borrowers rated CCC by either Moody’s or S&P: 46.9% overall/48.2% PE-backed.
  • Loans currently bid below 90: 48.3% overall/47.5% PE-backed.

Sponsor View

Among Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index loans, 29 private equity firms had no fewer than 10 credits as of Sept. 30. The table below breaks down for these sponsors the proportion of loans with the four loopholes in question:

Steve Miller 
CEO of Fulcrum Financial Data


Disclosures

This report is the product of Covenant Review. Covenant Review is an affiliate of Fitch Group, which also owns Fitch Ratings. Covenant Review is solely responsible for the content of this report, which was produced independently from Fitch Ratings.
All content is copyright 2023 by Covenant Review, LLC. The recipient of this report may not redistribute or republish any of the information contained herein, in part or whole, without the express written permission of Covenant Review, LLC and we will criminally and civilly prosecute copyright violations against firms and individuals who unlawfully distribute our work. The use of this report is further limited as described in the subscription agreement between Covenant Review, LLC and the subscriber. The information contained in this report is intended to generally describe certain covenant features. This report is not comprehensive, is not confidential to any person or entity, and should not be treated as a substitute for professional advice in any specific situation. Covenant Review, LLC makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the fitness of the\ information in this report for any particular purpose. If you require legal or other expert advice, you should seek the services of a qualified attorney or investment professional. Covenant Review, LLC does not render, and nothing in this report constitutes, legal or investment advice, and recipients of this report will not be treated or considered by Covenant Review, LLC as clients or customers except as described in the subscription agreement between Covenant Review, LLC and the subscriber. Any covenants discussed herein may be based on those contained in the preliminary offering memorandum or draft credit agreement distributed by the issuer or borrower in connection with the issuance of the bonds or loans, and the covenants published in the final offering memorandum or contained in the final indenture or credit agreement may differ from those presented herein. The reader should be aware that the final interpretation of any bond indenture, credit agreement, security or guarantee agreement, or other bond or loan documents, will generally be determined by the issuer or its counsel, or in certain circumstances, by a court or administrative body.
© 2023. CreditSights, Inc. All rights reserved.