APAC Financials: Impacts of an Elongated Conflict
Pramod Shenoi: Head of Asia-Pacific Research, Head of Financials - CreditSights
Lim Ze Hao, CFA: Analyst, Financials - CreditSights
Karen Wu, CFA: Senior Analyst, Financials - CreditSights
Trung Tran: Senior Analyst, APAC Insurance and Middle East Banks - CreditSights
12 March 2026
- How prolonged Middle East tensions transmit through energy prices, FX, and liquidity to shape APAC financial system stress.
- What APAC Financials Impacts of an Elongated Conflict mean for banks’ asset quality, margins, and funding across key economies.
- Why sovereign balance sheets and policy responses are critical drivers of credit risk differentiation in the region.
- How insurers and non-bank financial institutions may absorb volatility differently under extended geopolitical disruption.
- Where relative resilience and vulnerability emerge across APAC jurisdictions as the conflict duration lengthens.
Executive Summary
Timelines related to the length of the Middle East conflict are unclear; stating the obvious, the longer the conflict continues the more the damage is, given the Strait of Hormuz (SOH) closure; energy prices have oscillated with the market calibrating the near-term supply shortage with a medium-term good supply position.
In Asia, EM countries (ex Mainland China and Malaysia) are more affected; amongst the developed countries we see South Korea as most affected; we see implications of the economic conditions on the banking sectors of these countries, and so would be more cautious in investments in these jurisdictions in the near term.
We see a limited impact on Australia, Japan, Mainland China and Hong Kong (SAR), which gives us comfort in holding the paper of the first three jurisdictions; while we have a Market perform recommendation on Hong Kong banks we continue to be cautious about their low general provision levels.
We see a particularly low impact of the conflict on insurance companies.
While most NBFIs are unlikely to be materially impacted, HY NBFI spreads have gapped out due to a combination of risk-off and perceived supply risk from Indian NBFIs



