Skip to main content

The settlement Incora reached earlier this week with the UCC and Carlyle, holder of an uptiered 1.25 lien tranche, aims to pave the runway to a bankruptcy exit by resolving disputes over the aerospace company’s 2022 LME transaction. But there is still a good deal of creditor conflict around the pre-petition LME dealings that remains up in the air.

Impact of the new settlement is limited since it doesn’t address an adversary case brought by individual unsecured creditor Langur Maize and a group of 2024 and 2026 unsecured noteholders. The outcome of that litigation, which has been stayed by the bankruptcy court, is subject to Southern District of Texas Judge Marvin Isgur’s upcoming ruling on the debtor’s motion for summary judgment.

Yesterday in court, Judge Isgur said he’s already made his decision on the adversary, and his 40-page decision will be issued “in the coming weeks.” Judge Isgur also asked, specifically to the adversary litigant Langur Maize, if his delay in issuing the ruling will impact agreements with the debtor regarding confirmation of the plan and a potential settlement.

Jones Day, counsel for Langur Maize, said it would not be a disruption because the issues raised in the adversary proceeding were independent of its ability to agree to a restructuring settlement.

Judge Isgur also declined to issue an immediate ruling on the Carlyle/UCC settlement, instead instructing the debtor to amend the disclosure statement to reflect the terms. This procedural instruction circumvented arguments from the Kobre Kim group of 2024/2026 noteholders over the merits.

The controversary at the heart of the adversary proceeding is the 2022 uptiering transaction. A group of secured noteholders, including Silver Point and PIMCO, exchanged $1 billion of their holdings into new priming 7.5% cash/3% PIK notes due 2026.

A group of unsecured bondholders, consisting primarily of Carlyle and PE sponsor Platinum, then uptiered $446 million unsecured notes into a secured 1.25-lien position. The remaining 2024 and 2026 unsecured notes that did not participate and are subordinated by the new 1.25 position are represented by Jones Day in a state court litigation and the ongoing adversary proceeding.

In the recently announced settlement, Carlyle has agreed to waive its claim to recovery in the restructuring, an agreement ostensibly benefiting unsecured creditors such as the Kobre Kim group. The group stands to recover 3.5% of reorganized common equity along with a pro rata share of a $7.5 million cash pool. Despite this, the Kobre Kim group remains in opposition.

The ruling from Judge Isgur is eagerly anticipated, as it could validate or nullify the disputed uptiering transaction. Should the court side with the challenging creditors, it would mark a contrast with earlier decisions by the now-removed Judge Jones and could prompt a reassessment of similar financial maneuvers in future bankruptcy cases.

 

Jennifer Lappe, J.D.
LevFin Insights


Disclosures

This Report is for informational purposes only. Neither the information contained in this Report, nor any opinion expressed therein is intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or as personalized investment advice. CreditSights and its affiliates do not recommend the purchase or sale of financial products or securities, and do not give investment advice or provide any legal, auditing, accounting, appraisal, valuation or actuarial services. Neither CreditSights nor the persons involved in preparing this Report or their respective households has a financial interest in the securities discussed herein. Recommendations made in a report may not be suitable for all investors and do not take into account any particular user’s investment risk tolerance, return objectives, asset allocation, investment horizon, or any other factors or constraints. Information included in any article that includes analysis of documents, agreements, controversies, or proceedings is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney client relationship is created between any reader and CreditSights as a result of the publication of any research report, or any response provided by CreditSights (including, but not limited to, the ask an analyst feature or any other analyst interaction) or as the result of the payment to CreditSights of subscription fees. The material included in an article may not reflect the most current legal developments. We disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of any research report or communication to the fullest extent permitted by law. Reproduction of this report, even for internal distribution, is strictly prohibited. Receipt and review of this research report constitutes your agreement not to redistribute, retransmit, or disclose to others the contents, opinions, conclusion or information contained in this report (including any investment recommendations or estimates) without first obtaining express permission from CreditSights. The information in this Report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, neither its accuracy, nor completeness, nor the opinions based thereon are guaranteed. The products are being provided to the user on an “as is” basis, exclusive of any express or implied warranty or representation of any kind, including as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of the report or of any such information or data, or that the report will meet any user’s requirements. CreditSights may issue or may have issued other reports that are inconsistent with or may reach different conclusions than those represented in this Report, and all opinions are reflective of judgments made on the original date of publication. CreditSights is under no obligation to ensure that other reports are brought to the attention of any recipient of the Products. Certain data appearing herein is owned by, and used under license from, certain third parties. Please see Legal Notices for important information and limitations regarding such data. For terms of use, see Terms & Conditions.
If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report contact CreditSights at legal@creditsights.com.
© 2023. CreditSights, Inc. All rights reserved.