Skip to main content

Embedding ESG into Credit Risk Assessments

From a credit perspective, it’s crucial to incorporate ESG factors into the analysis of credit risk—and to do so consistently across sectors and time. That’s why at CreditSights we have refined our process of including ESG issues. 

As the leader in unbiased, global credit research, CreditSights is including ESG issues in our overall analysis of credit risk. That will see CreditSights analysts integrate that approach to ESG into the way they cover issuers in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific, spanning both investment-grade and high-yield. Our ESG framework serves as a bedrock for complete and holistic credit risk analysis going forward.

Our ESG Credit Risk Core Beliefs

  • E, S and G issues are potential sources of material credit risk (current or nascent and unrealized).
  • The priority claim and limited upside that bonds enjoy make downside risks more important.
  • Truly material ESG factors affecting credit risk are not always the same as those that dominate the headlines; controversy does not always equate to materiality.
  • Factors within E, S, and G affect different companies in different sectors can vary enormously; a one-size-fits-all approach is not possible.

Measures & Materiality

With so many factors that relate to E, S and G currently capturing the headlines, it is easy to lose sight of which ones are truly important when it comes to credit risk.

For us to include a measure within our analysis, it needs to have the capacity to materially affect credit risk (MACR). Therefore, even if a measure is often cited with reference to E, S, or G, it is excluded from our approach if it does not have the capacity to materially affect credit risk.

An existing controversy around an issue is not enough by itself to warrant inclusion as a measure. To be incorporated in our scoring process, the issue must present an actual credit risk with the potential to have a material impact.


Once we have determined the appropriate measures and peer group, we score the companies. First, we ensure that we are normalizing the data by an appropriate comparator. Second, we consider whether any two selected measures are in fact capturing the same underlying risk and therefore duplicative. The normalized measures are then converted into a 1 to 5 score (1 being the greatest risk, 5 the least) by considering them along a spectrum of risk:

ESG Scoring 1 to 5

CreditSights ESG Trajectory Ratings

As issuers increasingly invest in steps to improve their performance on key ESG issues, a large difference can exist between their current performance on ESG risk factors and where it is likely to perform in a few years. CreditSights ESG Trajectory Score allows our analysts to assess the likely path for an issuer over the next 24 months.

CreditSights ESG Disclosure Scores

Vast variation exists in the quality and quantity of ESG-related disclosure across issuers, sectors and regions. To highlight areas where we feel a more complete assessment of E, S and G risks requires more information, we offer CreditSights ESG Disclosure scores. We hope that publishing these scores might also encourage better disclosure in these areas.

Award-Winning, Completely Unbiased Research

On the investment grade and high yield securities of issuers around the globe.

Select an article to download a free piece of research.

Learn about Our Research

Thames Water: Haircut 100?

Dish Satellite

Starlink Surge: Industry Impact

Australian Banks: Issuer Calls Apr-24

Request a Demo

Qualifying institutions can request a complimentary consultation.
Once you complete the form, one of our specialists will be in touch to arrange an appropriate time to discuss.

Know More. Risk Better.®

Sign up to receive our latest credit insights direct to your inbox.