Hertz: Do the Indentures and the Credit Agreement Permit Uptiering the 2026s into Second-Lien Debt?
Ross Hallock, J.D.: Head of U.S. Bond Covenant Data
30 June 2026
- How Hertz explores refinancing strategies using alternative secured debt structures within existing frameworks.
- Which structural routes could help navigate limitations set by current debt documentation.
- What flexibility within credit agreements supports potential new financing approaches.
- How evolving maturity pressures shape strategic decision-making around refinancing options.
- Where interactions across debt documents create both constraints and strategic opportunities.
The Bottom Line™
Hertz assesses its capacity to shift existing obligations into alternative secured debt structures. The framework suggests room for replacing certain maturities under current agreements.
Existing indentures introduce approval requirements that may limit straightforward execution paths. Therefore, new structures could be considered to navigate these embedded constraints.
Additional flexibility may arise from provisions within broader credit agreements. These mechanisms enable exploration of varied secured financing approaches.
Refinancing timing becomes increasingly sensitive as contractual triggers draw closer. However, this dynamic tightens the window for executing strategic adjustments.
The analysis centers on how multiple governing documents interact within the capital structure. These relationships influence both feasibility and complexity of potential transactions.



