US Bankruptcy: Del Monte, UCC and majority lenders oppose minority lender group’s request to certify confirmation for direct appeal to Third Circuit
Kennedy Rose: Senior Reporter
22 June 2026
- How Del Monte bankruptcy appeal dispute is shaping tensions between lenders and restructuring stakeholders.
- Which legal arguments are driving conflict over fairness and priority in bankruptcy claim treatment.
- What role different lender groups play in influencing restructuring outcomes and negotiations.
- How court decisions may affect appeal strategy and broader restructuring dynamics in similar cases.
- Where evolving disputes could signal risks for investors involved in distressed syndicated loans.
Overview
Del Monte opposes efforts to fast track a bankruptcy appeal to a higher court. The company argues the request does not meet required legal standards.
Creditor groups support the company in challenging the minority lenders’ position. They emphasize existing bankruptcy rules already address the issues raised.
However, minority lenders claim unequal treatment compared with similarly ranked creditors. They argue the restructuring plan overlooks their recovery rights.
Courts declined attempts to delay implementation of the confirmed restructuring plan. Appeals continue as parties pursue alternative legal avenues.
The dispute highlights tensions between creditor groups during restructuring negotiations. Outcomes may influence future approaches in distressed lending situations.



