"Stonegate Blocker" Ropes In Asset Sale LMTs

Alastair Gillespie, J.D. Senior Covenant Analyst
- Covenant Review

17 February 2026

Download the Full Report to gain insights on:
  • How the Stonegate blocker attempts to restrict asset sale dropdowns and protect bondholders.
  • Which carveout provisions weaken the blocker and create potential loopholes for issuers.
  • What strengthened application of proceeds requirements mean for controlling asset sale proceeds.
  • How complementary covenant terms reinforce the blocker to limit liability management transactions.
  • Why this blocker matters for managing structural subordination risk in distressed scenarios.

The Bottom Line™

Stonegate and Pfleiderer sold valuable assets to Unrestricted Subsidiaries. This approach bypassed their limited investment capacity constraints.

Maxeda’s restructuring introduces a blocker targeting asset sale transactions. The blocker aims to regulate these liability management techniques.

Asset transfers exceeding certain thresholds outside restricted groups are prohibited. However, exceptions exist for legitimate business purposes and third parties.

Subjective carveouts allow issuers to interpret provisions quite narrowly. Additionally, investors must challenge questionable transactions after they occur.

Strengthened application requirements govern how asset sale proceeds are used. Market participants may find this approach useful despite inherent limitations.

Fill out the below form to view the full article:

Please note that we can only respond to valid business email addresses and the interview is already available to clients.

Stay in the loop with the latest credit insights direct to your inbox