KIK Consumer Products: Can KIK Use a Drop-Down Transaction to Incur Debt to address Liquidity under its Bond Covenants?
Sean Hanssler, J.D. - Director, Covenant Analyst, Covenant Review
8 September 2025
Insights into KIK’s drop-down transaction, bond covenants, liquidity options, J. Crew blocker implications, and investor considerations, including:
- Liquidity playbook: How a drop-down transaction could help KIK raise cash by moving assets to an Unrestricted Subsidiary and borrowing against them.
- Covenant capacity math: Where the estimated ~$915 million of investments capacity comes from across Restricted Payments and Permitted Investments baskets.
- Limits of leverage carveout: Why the 6x leverage-based investment carveout likely isn’t available and what that means for structuring options.
- J. Crew blockers explained: How two blocker provisions restrict transfers of Material Intellectual Property and narrow the scope of any drop-down.
- Practical feasibility check: Which non-IP assets might be movable, how such a deal could prime existing debt, and what investors should watch next.
Overview
Bloomberg reported that KIK Custom Products Inc. (“KIK”) is working with PJT Partners to evaluate its options to shore up liquidity amid earnings pressure. Additionally, a group of creditors to KIK have engaged Centerview Partners as an adviser. In our report, Can KIK Use an Uptiering Transaction to Incur Superpriority Debt under the Secured Bond Covenants? (the “Prior Report”), we explored how an uptiering transaction would implicate the covenants for KIK’s outstanding Secured Notes. We assume that subscribers have read the Prior Report; defined terms used in this report without definition have the meanings assigned to them in the Prior Report.
We have examined how much Restricted Payments and investments capacity KIK has under the covenants for its Secured Notes and the $450 million of 10.75% Senior Notes due 2032 (the “Unsecured Notes” and together with the Secured Notes, the “Notes”). KIK potentially could use this investments capacity to divert valuable assets to an Unrestricted Subsidiary and raise new debt at that Unrestricted Subsidiary. The Unrestricted Subsidiary would not be subject to the covenants for the Notes, so there would not be any restriction on how much debt it could incur or how it could use the proceeds of that debt. Accordingly, KIK could offer this new Unrestricted Subsidiary debt in exchange for, or use cash proceeds of, the new debt to shore up its liquidity needs. Just like in the J. Crew transaction, this new Unrestricted Subsidiary debt would prime the existing debt to the extent of the assets transferred.
